RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05000

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His records be corrected to reflect his 25 Aug 09 Fitness 
Assessment (FA) entry be changed to read “Good,” rather than 
“Unsatisfactory.” 

2.  His FA scores since 11 Jan 11 be declared void and removed 
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

1.  His 25 Aug 09 FA was recorded in error as his composite 
scores should have resulted in an overall assessment of “Good,” 
instead of “Unsatisfactory” based on the standards in effect at 
the time.

2.  His health care provider placed him on a composite waiver, 
but the Medical Group Commander unfairly overturned the waiver.  
Both his Director and Commander agreed that he should be on a 
composite waiver.  The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Surgeon 
General reviewed his case and agreed that he should have been 
exempt.

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Individual Fitness Assessment History, two AF Forms 422, 
Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification, two Air Forms 
469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, an email communique and a 
copy of his Letter of Reprimand (LOR).

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 May 82, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force.


In accordance with AFI 10-248, Fitness Program, to determine 
overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness 
score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic 
Fitness, Body Composition, and Muscular Fitness.  Military 
members receive a composite score on a 0 to 100 scale based on 
the following maximum component scores: 50 points for aerobic, 
30 points for body composition, 10 points for push-ups and 10 
points for sit-ups.  Furthermore, unit commanders may initiate 
or recommend administrative discharge action on individuals who 
fail four fitness tests within a 24-month period.  Attachment 
12, USAF Fitness Scoring, of the AFI reflects that males such as 
the applicant who are 45-49 years old must meet minimum value in 
each of the four components and achieve a composite point total 
greater than 75 points.  The fitness levels and composite scores 
are: 90 or above Excellent, 75-89.99 Good, 70-74.99 Marginal, 
and 70 or below Poor.

On 25 Aug 09, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an 
overall composite score of 73.67, which constituted an 
“unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with 
the following composite scores:  Cardio – Exempt, Abdominal 
Circumference – 39.00”/12.60 points, Push-ups – 42/9.50 points, 
Sit-ups – Exempt.

On 25 Aug 10, the applicant received a composite fitness score 
of 34.00, resulting in an unsatisfactory assessment.  He was 
exempt from all components except the abdominal circumference.  
His waist measurement was 41.50 inches, which exceeded the 
maximum of 39.00 inches for his age group.

On 29 Dec 10, the applicant received an unsatisfactory 
assessment with a composite score of 0.00, resulting in an 
unsatisfactory assessment.  He was exempt from all components 
except the abdominal circumference.  His waist measurement was 
44.00 inches, which exceeded the maximum of 39.00 inches for his 
age group.

On 14 Jan 11, the Medical Group Commander informed the Family 
Health Clinic that the applicant could not be recommended for an 
exemption for the abdominal circumference (AC) measurement for 
impending back surgery.  He further indicated a recommendation 
for an exemption could be for abdominal surgery if within the 
previous three months.

On 29 Mar 11, the applicant received a composite fitness score 
of 26.50, resulting in an unsatisfactory assessment.  He was 
exempt from all components except the abdominal circumference.  
His waist measurement was 42.00 inches, which exceeded the 
maximum of 39.00 for his age group.

On 27 Jun 11, the applicant received a composite fitness score 
of 34.00, resulting in an unsatisfactory assessment.  He was 
exempt from all components except the abdominal circumference.  
His waist measurement was 41.50 inches, which exceeded the 
maximum of 39.00 for his age group.

On 9 Sep 11, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was 
initiated exempting the applicant from completing all components 
of physical training (PT) from 9 Sep 11 through 8 Sep 12.  It 
was further noted the applicant was undergoing a Medical 
Evaluation Board (MEB) to determine fitness for worldwide duty 
and retention.  However, the AF Form 469 was not certified by 
the Health Care Provider, Force Health manager, and Profile 
Officer.

On 27 Sep 11, the applicant received a composite fitness score 
of 26.50, resulting in an unsatisfactory assessment.  He was 
exempt from all components except the abdominal circumference.  
His waist measurement was 42.00 inches, which exceeded the 
maximum of 39.00 for his age group.

On 29 Sep 11, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) 
for failing his fourth FA.

On 30 Dec 11, the applicant received a composite fitness score 
of 26.50, resulting in an unsatisfactory assessment.  He was 
exempt from all components except the abdominal circumference.  
His waist measurement was 42.00 inches, which exceeded the 
maximum of 39.00 for his age group.

On 28 Mar 12, the applicant received a composite fitness score 
of 0.00, resulting in an unsatisfactory assessment.  He was 
exempt from all components except the abdominal circumference.  
His waist measurement was 44.00, which exceeded the maximum of 
39.00 for his age group. 

On 4 Sep 12, an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s 
Qualification Status, was issued exempting the applicant from 
completing all components of physical training (PT) from 9 Sep 
11 through 8 Sep 12.  It was further noted the applicant could 
NOT participate in organized group PT, that he was under 
specialty care, and follow exercise recommendations from his 
provider. 

On 26 Sep 12, an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s 
Qualification Status, was issued exempting the applicant from 
completing all components of his PT training from 20 Sep 12 to 
20 Sep 13.

On 31 Aug 13, the applicant was permanently disability retired 
in the grade of major (O-4) with a 50 percent disability rating.

________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends the applicant’s 25 Aug 09 FA should be 
corrected to reflect an overall score of “Good,” instead of 
“Unsatisfactory,” indicting that at the time of his 25 Aug 09 FA 
the minimum passing score was 75 and based his waist 
measurement, run time, push-ups, and sit-ups, his score should 
have been computed at 78.25, a passing score.

DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 
11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the 
applicant was exempt from the  waist measurement component of 
these FAs.  The documentation provided shows the applicant’s 
health care provider placed him on a composite exemption as of 
9 Sep 11.  

As for his 29 Mar 11 and 27 Jun 11 FAs, there is no evidence his 
health care provided made a final recommendation to place him on 
a composite exemption as it had not been certified by the Health 
Care Provider, Force Health Manager, and Profile Officer.  
Therefore, the 29 Mar ll and 27 Jun 11 assessments should not be 
disturbed. 

The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference 
for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422 that 
exempted him from all portions of the FA.  This extended his 
composite exemption to 11 Apr 12.

His Neurosurgeon ordered an exemption; however, the Profile 
Review Officer countered the recommendation.  Under the 
provisions of the AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), it is very clear that 
the individual’s health care provider makes the determination 
for exemptions.  

The Director and Deputy Director of the ANG Surgeon General’s 
office agree that he should have been on a composite waiver from 
2 Feb 12 to present.

A complete copy of the applicant’s response, with attachments, 
is at Exhibit E.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.
2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  The 
applicant contends that because his medical condition precluded 
him from participating in physical conditioning, he should have 
been exempt from all components of the fitness assessments (FA) 
since 11 Jan 11.  After a thorough review of the evidence of 
record and the applicant’s complete submission, we agree.  While 
we note the comments of the Air Force OPR indicating that he 
should have been exempt from only three of the five contested 
FAs, we find it reasonable to believe that the applicant’s 
medical condition, which ultimately caused him to be permanently 
retired for physical disability, precluded him from attaining a 
passing score on all five of the contested FAs.  As for his 
request that his 25 Aug 09 FA be corrected to reflect a passing 
score of “Good,” we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
AFPC/DPSIM and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that this FA score was computed and recorded in 
error.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be 
corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that:

	a.  The overall score of his 25 Aug 09 Fitness Assessment 
be corrected to reflect 78.25 points, instead of 73.67 points, 
which constitutes an overall “Good” assessment.

	b.  The Fitness Assessments, dated 29 Mar 11, 27 Jun 11, 
27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 are declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05000 in Executive Session on 10 Sep 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

?
All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Oct 12, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 28 Dec 12.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jan 13.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Feb 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair